| What is the name of your interest group? | Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group |
| Your Name | Susan Howell |
| Your Email | smhowell@siu.edu |
| Please select the name of the section your group belongs to (if applicable) | Metadata & Collections |
| Which report are you submitting? | May |
| How many times did your group meet or hold an activity during this reporting period? | 2-3 |
| First Activity | March 2nd IG Week – hosted 3 presentations for IG Week. |
| Second Activity | April 14th Open forum discussion. |
| Third Activity | |
| Fourth Activity | |
| Fifth Activity | |
| What will your group be working on for the next 6 months? | Assessing the interests of the group and planning for future activities. |
| How did your work contribute to diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or belonging within Core or the library profession? What areas of improvement do you see for your IG or Core in these areas? | Our sessions are open to everyone. Everyone's opinions are valued and respected. Everyone is given the opportunity to share. |
| Is there anything Core could have provided during this time that would have helped your group with its activities? | Not that I am aware of. |
| Please provide suggestions for future education topics, initiatives, publications, resources, or other activities that could be developed based on your group’s discussions or work. | |
| Please describe anything you need to bring to the Core Board for discussion or action at their next meeting. | |
| Please share any additional comments, concerns, or suggestions you have. | Shari Theroux is the continuing chair. I don't know if that was updated this year. Her email is shari.theroux@sdstate.edu |
| Today’s Date | 04/28/2026 |
Category: Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group
Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group – December 2026 Report
| What is the name of your interest group? | Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group |
| Your Name | Susan Howell |
| Your Email | smhowell@siu.edu |
| Please select the name of the section your group belongs to (if applicable) | Metadata & Collections |
| Which report are you submitting? | December |
| How many times did your group meet or hold an activity during this reporting period? | 2-3 |
| First Activity | Discussion group with open-ended topic. |
| Second Activity | Discussion group around the topic of weeding. |
| Third Activity | |
| Fourth Activity | |
| Fifth Activity | |
| What will your group be working on for the next 6 months? | Discussion group in January on the topic of AI applications. IG Week presentations. |
| How did your work contribute to diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or belonging within Core or the library profession? What areas of improvement do you see for your IG or Core in these areas? | Our session were open to everyone in the CORE community. |
| Is there anything Core could have provided during this time that would have helped your group with its activities? | Not to my knowledge. |
| Please provide suggestions for future education topics, initiatives, publications, resources, or other activities that could be developed based on your group’s discussions or work. | |
| Please describe anything you need to bring to the Core Board for discussion or action at their next meeting. | |
| Please share any additional comments, concerns, or suggestions you have. | |
| Today’s Date | 01/06/2026 |
Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group – May 2025 Report
| What is the name of your interest group? | Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group |
| Your Name | Tammie Busch |
| Your Email | tabusch@siue.edu |
| Please select the name of the section your group belongs to (if applicable) | Metadata & Collections |
| Which report are you submitting? | May |
| How many times did your group meet or hold an activity during this reporting period? | 2-3 |
| First Activity | Our interest group held the second of our two focused discussion meetings on 2/5/25. This second focused discussion centered around the topic of conducting a workload study. I invited the authors of "Faculty Workload Guidelines in Technical Services," published in the edited volume Technical Services in the 21st Century, to lead the discussion. |
| Second Activity | Our interest group hosted three presentations that focused on assessing operations in technical services at our IG Week session in March 2025. |
| Third Activity | |
| Fourth Activity | |
| Fifth Activity | |
| What will your group be working on for the next 6 months? | Susan Howell will be onboarding a new co-chair, Shari Theroux, Systems & Discovery Librarian at South Dakota State University, this summer. Susan will decide on activities for 2025-2026 with Shari's input. |
| How did your work contribute to diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or belonging within Core or the library profession? What areas of improvement do you see for your IG or Core in these areas? | In August of 2024, to ensure we were providing the support our IG members wanted and needed, Susan and I sent out a two-question anonymous survey on the Connect site to learn more about our members' interests. From the responses, we built our programs that our members expressed interest in. |
| Is there anything Core could have provided during this time that would have helped your group with its activities? | I requested help setting up a Zoom with registration on 12/19/24 using the online form. I followed up on 1/8/25 because I had not heard anything. I was told it would be set up by 1/10/25, but that date came and went, so I ended up setting up everything using my work account. It was actually pretty easy to do, but better communication about what to expect with the Core process would have been helpful. |
| Please provide suggestions for future education topics, initiatives, publications, resources, or other activities that could be developed based on your group’s discussions or work. | I have no suggestions. |
| Please describe anything you need to bring to the Core Board for discussion or action at their next meeting. | |
| Please share any additional comments, concerns, or suggestions you have. | I enjoyed my time as a Core IG chair. I look forward to being involved with more Core work in the future. |
| Today’s Date | 05/07/2025 |
Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group – December 2024 Report
| What is the name of your interest group? | Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group |
| Your Name | Susan M. Howell |
| Your Email | smhowell@siu.edu |
| Please select the name of the section your group belongs to (if applicable) | Metadata & Collections |
| Which report are you submitting? | December |
| How many times did your group meet or hold an activity during this reporting period? | 4-5 |
| First Activity | The ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) held a sharing session on September 11, 2024, from 10?30-11:30 CST. Ideas were generated as to what topics would be of interest for focused discussion sessions. |
| Second Activity | TSWEIG held a sharing session on October 9, 2024 from 1:30 to 2:30 CST. |
| Third Activity | TSWEIG held a focused discussion on October 28, 2024, from 10:00 to 11:30 CST. The topic was future planning for Technical Services. Susan Gibbons's "Time Horizon 2020: Library Renaissance" was shared in advance to stimulate conversation. |
| Fourth Activity | |
| Fifth Activity | |
| What will your group be working on for the next 6 months? | TSWEIG held a sharing session on November 6, 2024, from 11:30 to 12:30 CST. |
| How did your work contribute to diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or belonging within Core or the library profession? What areas of improvement do you see for your IG or Core in these areas? | IG Chairs surveyed member to determine what their needs were and how they would be best supported, |
| Is there anything Core could have provided during this time that would have helped your group with its activities? | No. |
| Please provide suggestions for future education topics, initiatives, publications, resources, or other activities that could be developed based on your group’s discussions or work. | |
| Please describe anything you need to bring to the Core Board for discussion or action at their next meeting. | |
| Please share any additional comments, concerns, or suggestions you have. | |
| Today’s Date | 01/28/2025 |
Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group – May 2024 Report
| What is the name of your interest group? | Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group |
| Your Name | Tammie Busch |
| Your Email | tabusch@siue.edu |
| Please select the name of the section your group belongs to (if applicable) | Metadata & Collections |
| Which report are you submitting? | May |
| How many times did your group meet or hold an activity during this reporting period? | 1 |
| First Activity | The ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) hosted four presenters and three presentations during Core Interest Group Week: Ali Norvell and Rebecca Saunders, Western Carolina University, presented on customizing a library-wide deselection workflow, Anita Kazmierczak, National Library Service for Blind and Print-Disabled, Library of Congress, presented on use of the MARC 072 field in optimizing search and discovery, and Alvin Stockdale, National Library of Medicine, presented on using AI to improve technical services workflows. |
| Second Activity | |
| Third Activity | |
| Fourth Activity | |
| Fifth Activity | |
| What will your group be working on for the next 6 months? | We are not completely sure at this point. We want to give some thought and time to how ADEI work and technical services workflow efficiencies intersect. We are also interested in continuing to explore the use of AI in workflow efficiencies. The returning co-chair and incoming co-chair will be meeting in July to discuss this more. |
| How did your work contribute to diversity, equity, inclusion, accessibility, or belonging within Core or the library profession? What areas of improvement do you see for your IG or Core in these areas? | Participation in the Core Interest Group Week allowed us to contribute to the library profession. However, ADEI is an area we would like to give more focus to. Many of us in the technical services operational areas struggle to keep up with the day-to-day work of our units due to understaffing. Still, we want to explore how we can incorporate ADEI work into our workflows. |
| Is there anything Core could have provided during this time that would have helped your group with its activities? | |
| Please provide suggestions for future education topics, initiatives, publications, resources, or other activities that could be developed based on your group’s discussions or work. | |
| Please describe anything you need to bring to the Core Board for discussion or action at their next meeting. | |
| Please share any additional comments, concerns, or suggestions you have. | |
| Today’s Date | 06/03/2024 |
Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group – December 2023 Report
Part of the Metadata & Collections Section
The group met 1 time this quarter.
Recent Activities
First Activity
The ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) held a roundtable discussion on June 25 at the 2023 ALA Annual Conference in Chicago. Its program theme was “Workflow Development in Library and Technical Services.” Five discussion leaders led four discussions on a range of topics, including identity management, workflow creation, training for a system migration, staffing, and human capital management.
Meets Core’s strategic goals for Career Building and Recognition
Second Activity
We will be participating in the Core Interest Group Week in March 2024.
Meets Core’s strategic goals for Career Building and Recognition
What will your group be working on for the next 6 months?
IG co-chairs will be meeting in January to develop and finalize our program theme and a call for proposals for Interest Group Week 2024.
Submitted by Tammie Busch on 12/18/2023
Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group – May 2023 Report
Part of the Metadata & Collections Section
The group met 2-3 times this quarter.
Recent Activities
First Activity
The ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWE IG) held a roundtable discussion at the ALA Annual Conference on 26 June 2022. The themes of the discussion were “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) cataloging” and “Integrated Library System (ILS) migration and workflow”. The discussions were held at the Washington Convention Center and were led by the two discussion leaders as well as the IG Co-Chairs. The session was well attended. A detailed report was written for this session: https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2022.2148932.
Program Theme: Workflow Adapts to DEI Cataloging or ILS Migration
Time: June 26, Sunday, 4-5:00PM EDT, 2022
Location: Washington Convention Center, 150B
Repairing the Catalog: Implementing DEI to Cataloging and Authority Work
Discussion Facilitator: Whitney Buccicone, Director of Discovery Services, University of Virginia Library
Changing our practices in Technical Services to make our description (in subject headings, authority records, and more) focus on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) and reparative work is crucial to our field these days. This discussion will focus on what work is being done at your institution, case studies from others, what blockers you may be facing in beginning this work and how DEI cataloging impacts your library's workflow. We will discuss solutions to these blockers, how to implement DEI to cataloging as well as maximizing workflow efficiency for DEI cataloging.
Possible Discussion Questions:
What steps has your institution taken to applying DEI/reparative work in your description practices?
Have you heard of any other initiatives that other institutions have taken that you would like to share?
How does DEI cataloging affect your library's workflow? How to improve workflow efficiency for DEI cataloging?
What blockers do you face in making progress in this area? How have you gotten administration buy-in for this work?
Migration Surprises: Workflows and Lessons Learned after Migration
Discussion Facilitators: Jennifer Eustis, Meghan Bergin, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries
Migration requires new workflows, workarounds, and new ways of approaching how librarians do their work at institutional as well as consortium levels. The facilitators of this roundtable will share their experiences of migrating to the open-source library services platform FOLIO at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and their consortium. It will include conversations about various aspects of transitioning during a migration and merge, such as training and documentation; metadata mapping and cleanup; the cutover process; and bumps encountered during go live and implementing full production using the new system.
Possible Discussion Questions:
How many of you have recently migrated or will migrate soon? Which library service platform did you or are you going to migrate to? How was that decision made?
What training did you conduct and how did you measure its effectiveness?
Did you decide to redo your documentation or update it for your new system?
When do you finish metadata cleanup? What lessons are we still learning from the migration process?
Meets Core’s strategic goals for Membership and Value to Members
Second Activity
The ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) held its program successfully for the 2023 ALA Core IG Week. The IG's session was held online on Friday, March 10, 2023, from 11-12 am (CST). 475 people registered for the session and 278 attended it live.
The session slides have been posted to the Connect site: https://connect.ala.org/core/discussion/slides-now-available-for-the-core-technical-services-workflow-efficiency-interest-group-tsweig-session-at-2023-ala-core-ig-week#bmbe3ce818-b45c-4fba-96de-f9957253ac33 (please scroll to the bottom to see the files). The session’s recording link can be accessed from: https://ala-events.zoom.us/rec/share/pJxdlTRq-VylLwBKVKJtunviBdh1QEFn1GlKSimquSIFJkuq31jbPzrAL1SMtWv1.-hIvOFHUDpAMqRit
Program Theme: Hybrid Workspaces and Digital Workflows
Hybrid Workflow Development for Catalog Maintenance: A Case Study
David Floyd, Chief Cataloging Librarian, Subject Librarian for Judaic Studies, Binghamton University Libraries
Catalog maintenance (sometimes called "cleanup") is a critical component of the long-term development of a library's catalog, albeit one that is not always the central focus. Like many library cataloging units, the COVID-19 Pandemic reduced our cataloging capacity to remote work. As such, catalog maintenance, much of which can be done from any computer connected to our ILS, became a critical component of the unit's daily activities. Since returning to the office in 2021, our institution has increasingly recognized the value of flexibility in work location, allowing projects that can be done while working off-site to remain a priority. Our major ongoing maintenance project is working with large multipart sets that are inconsistently cataloged. Approximately 15% of Binghamton University Libraries' 28,000 musical scores are collections of scores comprising a composer's complete works. Ideally, these large, multi-part, non-circulating collections are cataloged consistently with either comprehensive records for each set, or individual records for each score within the set. Our catalog is inconsistent in this approach and requires remediation. The remediation workflow maximizes flexibility in who participates, where, and when, by siloing the portion of the work requiring data processing and advanced music cataloging skills. This presentation will detail the development of the workflow for standardizing composers' collected works sets, how the project is designed for accommodating hybrid work, and its progress since launching in Summer 2022.
Meeting Our Needs Virtually: An Efficient Workflow for a Remote Cataloging Internship Project
Yoko Ferguson, Cataloging and Metadata Librarian, Learning Resources Division, University of the District of Columbia
A few weeks into the new position, a Metadata Librarian discovered that 500+ print thesis records were only cataloged locally and not in OCLC Connexion nor the Network Zone in Alma, their consortium catalog. This was envisioned as an opportunity for a possible remote cataloging project with a library school student. While hands-on cataloging experience is crucial for cataloging and technical services jobs even at entry level positions, not everyone has the opportunities or resources to land internships at their school. Understanding the experience and skills included on most job descriptions, the work was streamlined as a remote project where an intern could gain hands-on cataloging experience with OCLC Connexion and become familiar with various MARC fields and codes, as well as current cataloging rules, tools, and resources. In addition to cataloging thesis records in OCLC, incorporating the intern's interests and needs, the librarian also came up with small projects that would be useful and helpful for both the intern and the library, such as reviewing and upgrading the Library of Congress Name Authority Records or manipulating a set of records with MarcEdit. Utilizing online tools already available to them–OCLC Connexion Online Save File, Outlook OneDrive, and Zoom–their current workflow allows them to work, communicate, and meet their needs virtually. This presentation discusses this pilot project that has the potential to lead to another remote project with library school interns who are eager to gain cataloging experience regardless of where and what time zone they live.
Who, What, Where: Establishing Good Communicative Workflows in a Hybrid Cataloging Environment
Rachel Turner, Senior Metadata Strategy Librarian, Virginia Commonwealth University
Cataloging in a hybrid environment can cause difficulties in communication and a breakdown in workflows. Catalogers have long been used to being on site, and therefore being able to pop over to their colleagues with questions about a workflow or cataloging issue. However, in a hybrid environment, when this easy communication method is no longer possible, workflows become siloed; each person may make their own modifications to a workflow to suit their needs, and it is not until the whole department gets together for a meeting that these inconsistencies are discovered, discussed, and sorted out. This leads to confusion, as people being trained on new tasks may be taught different ways of doing things, and over time the catalog becomes inconsistent for users. As someone who came into a hybrid environment from a traditional one, it is my job to come up with methods to identify workflow breakdowns and inconsistencies and find avenues to correct the resulting siloes. This presentation will discuss my experience adapting existing workflows to work better in a hybrid environment.
ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group Co-Chairs
Sai Deng (sai.deng@ucf.edu)
Caroline Saccucci (csus@loc.gov)
Meets Core’s strategic goals for Membership and Value to Members
What will your group be working on for the next 6 months?
The ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) will hold a roundtable discussion at the 2023 ALA Annual Conference.
Program Theme: Workflow Development in Library and Technical Services
Time: June 25, Sunday, 4-5pm CST, 2023
Location: McCormick Place, W175c
Programs:
Workflows Across the Identity Multiverse: Dealing with a Multitude of Authority Identifiers in Current and Future Workflows
Discussion Facilitators: Jeff Mixter, OCLC Senior Product Manager, Metadata & Digital Services, Global Product Management, and Richard Urban, Sr. Program and Engagement Officer for the OCLC Research Library Partnership
Description: OCLC is engaging with the community to address the challenges of building new workflows for managing identities across traditional bibliographic records while also taking advantage of new linked data platforms. This session invites meeting participants to share how they are working across their organizations to connect entity workflows, library service platforms, digital repositories, research information management, and scholarly communication.
Possible Discussion Questions:
How are persistent identifiers for research/special collections changing Technical Services workflows?
How do Technical Services staff work in cross-organization and cross-divisional environments where common data is used/created in disparate workflows?
How are you reusing or linking identity data across different organizational silos?
How are you managing the use of different identifiers (ISNI, ORCID, LCNAF, VIAF, etc.) in your data?
Navigating the Challenges of Adapting a Unique Catalog Maintenance Workflow after Migration to a New ILS
Discussion Facilitator: William Schultz, Jr., Head of Cataloging Services, Booth Library, Eastern Illinois University
Description: In June of 2020, Booth Library at Eastern Illinois University (along with most of the rest of the 88+ institutional member consortium, CARLI) migrated to Ex Libris' Alma, almost 20 years after the last migration of this magnitude. Of the many workflows that needed to be adapted to Alma was that of handling lost and missing items. Lost and missing are two distinct statuses for items, and each instance requires examination or handling by multiple departmental constituents, including Circulation, Cataloging, and subject area librarians. The ripple effect resulting from mishandling and workflow issues has ramifications for multiple areas. The heads of Cataloging, Circulation, and Collection Development worked together to develop a new set of checks and workflows for lost/missing items. This collaborative effort provides a positive example for other workflow challenges.
Possible Discussion Questions:
How do you know when there is a workflow problem that exists? What are some examples?
What kind of leadership does a major change in a workflow require?
What are the ways that a major event like an ILS migration or a staffing change prompt the inspiration to adapt or transform a workflow?
Preparing Cataloging Staff for New Library Services Platforms (LSP)
Discussion Facilitator: Sophie Dong, Lead Librarian for Cataloging, Syracuse University Libraries
Description: Implementing a new system is a big task. Many critical factors affect whether the process is a success. Designing and providing effective training is one of the critical factors. Well designed and managed training cannot only reduce stress and build up confidence but also ensure a smooth and success transition. The purpose of this roundtable discussion is to bring together professionals and practitioners in the field of library cataloging (Technical Services) to discuss and share strategies and tactics for staff training with new LSPs. The discussion will provide an opportunity to explore effective training methods and address challenges during implementation; it is also a platform for institutions to share success stories or seek advice on addressing concerns.
Possible Discussion Questions:
Questions on strategies and techniques for training cataloging staff on new LSP:
What are ways to identify specific training requirements across cataloging staff and tailor the training programs accordingly?
What are the effective training methods to help staff break down the technical barrier? (Examples could be in-person workshops, video recording, webinars, guides and documentation, vendor-provided training materials, etc.)
Do catalogers need a comprehensive training program that covers all essential aspects of the new system?
When should training begin and which competencies and skills should be focused on first?
Questions on handling challenges and obstacles:
What are the best ways to help staff reduce anxiety and negative emotions?
Communication
Leveraging Human Capitals within Technical Services Department to Meet the Changing Information Needs
Discussion Facilitator: Hong Yao, Director, Technical Services, Queens Public Library
Description: The workflow of Technical Services needs to be changed constantly, whether out of necessity because of the change of product formats, specs etc., or to achieve higher efficiency with the help of technology advancement. Many of us are used to it. However, the change of workflow involves the change of staffing within Technical Services and beyond. That is a more challenging issue facing us. I would like to share our stories of leveraging the existing staff resources to expand our services.
Possible Discussion Questions:
Current staffing level and core responsibilities in relationship to collection sizes & formats
Challenges facing the current organization charts in relationship to different model of workflows
Success stories to share
Thank you for your interest! We look forward to seeing you at the session!
ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group Co-Chairs
Sai Deng (sai.deng@ucf.edu)
Caroline Saccucci (csus@loc.gov)
Is there anything Core could have provided during this time that would have helped your group with its work?
If Core can help us to update our session information in the ALA 2023 Schedular (under Sunday, June 25, 2023, 4:00 PM – 5:00 PM CT, Technical Workflow Efficiency Interest Group Meeting), that'll be great! Our session information can be found at Connect: https://connect.ala.org/core/discussion/2023-ala-annual-program-workflow-development-in-the-library-and-technical-services.
Please provide suggestions for future education topics, initiatives, publications, resources, or other activities that could be developed based on your group’s work.
Future education, research and discussion topics: artificial intelligence and workflow, Linked Open Data and workflow, system migration and workflow, international collaboration and project workflow etc.
Additional comments or concerns:
Incoming Co-Chair
Tammie Busch, tabusch@siue.edu
Submitted by Sai Deng on 06/15/2023
Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group – December 2022 Report
Part of the Metadata & Collections Section
The group met 1 time this quarter.
Recent Activities
First Activity
Theme: Workflow Adapts to DEI Cataloging or ILS Migration
Time: June 26, Sunday, 4-5:00PM EDT, 2022
Location: Washington Convention Center, 150B
The ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWE IG) held a roundtable discussion at the ALA Annual Conference on Jun 26, 2022. The themes of the discussion were Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) cataloging and Integrated Library System (ILS) migration and workflow. The discussions were held at the Washington Convention Center and were led by the two discussion leaders as well as the IG Co-Chairs. The session was well attended, and the discussion was very lively and engaging.
Repairing the Catalog: Implementing DEI to Cataloging and Authority Work
The DEI value has profoundly impacted the practices in cataloging and metadata work in libraries. To make the bibliographic and authority records DEI compliant and promote inclusive metadata has been a hot topic in the library community. This discussion focused on what DEI work has been done in different institutions, how DEI practices impact library’s workflows and what the possible blockers to DEI effort are. It was led by Whitney Buccicone, Director of Discovery Services at the University of Virginia Library and co-facilitated by one of the IG Co-Chairs due to the large turnout.
Buccicone first asked participants to discuss the steps they have already taken to apply DEI and reparative work to resource description practices. The participants started with changing the term “Illegal alien” in library catalogs and discovery systems. Several participants talked about specific examples of implementing local heading changes in their library systems. Central Michigan University, which uses Alma and Primo, indicated that they still maintained local headings. Washington Research Library Consortium talked about their approaches: first, to set up an indication rule in Alma for the local heading changes and later also to rely on an indication rule set up in Primo, which allows the display of the desired headings. Additionally in Alma, they turned on and ran a Preferred Term Correction (PTC) script to automatically update subject terms in bibliographic records based on the LC authority files. Carleton College also reported on including a special MARC 9XX field coded in bibliographic records to first run an Alma indication rule and then a Primo indication rule to display the local heading of “Undocumented immigrants.” In November 2021, LC announced that it would replace “Illegal aliens” with two paired terms: “Noncitizens” and “Illegal immigration”. This decision has impacted libraries’ workflows and some of their workarounds. For instance, Carleton no longer needs to utilize the special MARC 9XX field in the bibliographic record and update the display in Primo using indication rules. It is just not substantial anymore. Washington Research Library Consortium still uses their local practice, but they allow their members to choose if this local subject heading should display or not. Presently, Central Michigan University still maintains their local authority files.
Regarding other reparative projects that libraries are working on, one librarian mentioned that they are replacing the term “Indians of North America” with “Indigenous People in North America.” Another librarian said that there are about 4,000 subject headings concerning the tribes. Other librarians commented that it will be a daunting task to evaluate, change and apply these terms in systems. One librarian also shared that the opinions of the members of the community matter, which was strongly agreed upon by the participants. From the discussion, it seemed that although there is confusion about how to do reparative work, this work has been happening at all levels and at all different sizes of institutions.
When the participants were asked if they document their workflows for reparative metadata work, several librarians replied that they did. One said that they document all the steps taken. Another librarian said that they have all the updated terms as well as old terms in a spreadsheet, so the terms can be referred to when needed.
Inclusive metadata and reparative editing for digital collections was also discussed. One librarian highlighted the reparative metadata projects panel organized by the Sunshine State Digital Network (SSDN) . She shared that the ATTK Museum, a museum of Seminole culture and history located on the Big Cypress Indian Reservation in Hendry County, Florida, improved their descriptions in catalog records for 19th century newspapers as well as for digital collections. The University of Central Florida Libraries performed an audit of their juvenile biographies for gender, race, ethnicity, and nationality in the Curriculum Materials Center, and added local subject headings, Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT) and Homosaurus terms to their catalog records. The Florida State University Libraries performed computational analysis of the digital collections in NVivo as well as manual analysis, created a “priority list” for collections that need re-description, documented their workflow, and wrote harmful content statement and inclusive editing guidelines. They summarized a few approaches to repairing the metadata, such as using less neutral phrasing, providing context for description, and using precise names. Other librarians echoed similar approaches. Some said that they added statements acknowledging that biases may exist in materials and finding aids descriptions. The University of Virginia Library looked at their own history and focused on changing terms related to the Thomas Jefferson collection. For example, they replaced “slavery” with “enslavement.” They also looked at terms on indigenous people. They created a staff survey and plan to launch another survey for faculty members asking for desired term changes.
Finally, Buccicone asked what blockers libraries have encountered in DEI cataloging. Participants mentioned factors such as time constraints, how to determine priorities in changing the subjects, and collaboration among different departments in a library. One librarian recommended assessing user needs, while another suggested getting feedback from public services. Conducting a pilot project before performing large scale changes was also recommended by some librarians.
Migration Surprises: Workflows and Lessons Learned after Migration
The second roundtable discussion topic was “Migration Surprises: Workflows and Lessons Learned after Migration” by Jennifer Eustis and Meghan Bergin, both at the University of Massachusetts Amherst (UMA) Libraries. Many ILS systems are coming to their end-of-life, and vendors are providing less support for older systems. This is leading libraries to make decisions to migrate to a new library services platform (LSP). Migration requires new workflows, workarounds, and new ways of approaching how librarians do their work at institutional as well as consortium levels. The facilitators shared their experiences of migrating to the open-source library services platform FOLIO at UMA and their consortium. The roundtable participants then had an open discussion about various aspects of a system migration, such as training and documentation, metadata cleanup, and lessons learned during the process.
The facilitators began the discussion by asking how many at the table had recently undergone, or were planning for, an ILS migration. Many of the participants had been through a migration, but several participants either were about to undergo one or were still in the information-gathering phase. Of those that had migrated, the LSPs mentioned were Alma, OCLC Wise, Sierra, Symphony, and FOLIO. A participant from LC announced that LC plans to migrate to a new platform with support for BIBFRAME. Since the solicitation is still out for bid, however, the name of the vendor or platform is yet unknown.
The discussion moved on to the positives and negatives of LSPs. Vendors tend to focus more on the front end to ensure positive end-user experiences. For instance, Sierra was noted for its excellent searching functionality. Participants seemed overall satisfied with Alma’s cataloging, authority control, and circulation functionality, but they noted less satisfaction with reporting, batch processing, and acquisitions functionality. Reporting functionality is problematic in FOLIO as well. Libraries need a coder with SQL knowledge to get data out of FOLIO, although EBSCO is starting to offer improved front-end reporting to assist FOLIO users. One participant related that their systems librarian and software developer had been able to write scripts for the Voyager system and appreciated that their ILS was hosted locally. After the migration, however, the systems librarian retired, and the developer did not want to learn how to work with Alma. This left the heavy lifting on the shoulders of the catalogers. Of course, not all libraries have systems administrators or software developers, nor can they locally host their own ILS; instead, they need to rely on private companies such as Ex Libris and Amazon for cloud storage, which has led to some privacy concerns. Several participants noted that Alma workflows are inflexible and that one must complete every single step of the predesigned workflows in order to move on to the next task. Finally, participants agreed that vendors and platforms should provide better support for Arabic.
The discussion then turned to training in the new platform. Most libraries trained their staff prior to the migration, but a few waited until after the migration to train during implementation. Participants mentioned that the documentation provided by the vendor was often too complex and dense to be truly useful to staff. One of the participants mentioned that watching YouTube videos about Alma were easier to follow than reading the documentation provided by Ex Libris.
There was some good discussion about the actual migration process. One of the participants predicted that a migration is imminent at her library, but she has never experienced one. She wanted to have a clearer idea of what occurs during a system migration in terms of the timeline. Participants mentioned that the actual data migration usually takes place within the space of a weekend, although some parts of the migration may happen at different times, and that vendors work with libraries to set deadlines for various migration-related tasks. The larger issue is the metadata cleanup before and, especially, after the migration occurs. The consensus was that, in fact, a migration is never quite finished. One participant maintained that it is better to clean up the metadata after the migration to Alma because this provides staff with an opportunity to learn how to use the new system.
Finally, the facilitators asked about lessons learned. Several participants emphasized the need for buy-in from all staff at all levels and, especially, for management and systems administrators to recognize how much work and time the migration process will take. LSPs should be easy to use with efficient workflows, but libraries should not expect to maintain pre-migration workflows just because “that’s how we’ve always done it.” Finally, a new LSP provides libraries with an excellent opportunity to evaluate workflows and staff/unit roles and revise where appropriate.
This session was hosted by the IG Co-Chairs Sai Deng and Caroline Saccucci. Yan (Clara) Liao helped in planning the session. The IG’s site at Connect can be accessed from https://connect.ala.org/core/communities/community-home?CommunityKey=891907d5-afd8-47c9-9161-24662ceb9474.
Meets Core’s strategic goals for Membership and Value to Members
What will your group be working on for the next 6 months?
Our committee will organize a session for the 2023 Core IG week, and we'll also plan a meeting and a program for the 2023 ALA Annual Conference.
Is there anything Core could have provided during this time that would have helped your group with its work?
Emails from Core regarding planning the IG week and the ALA Annual will be very helpful.
Submitted by Sai Deng on 12/16/2022
Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group – May 2022 Report
Part of the Metadata & Collections Section
The group met 2-3 times this quarter.
Recent Activities
First Activity
The Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) held its spring virtual session on March 11 at the 2022 ALA Core IG Week, with the theme “Workflow Trends and Cases in Library Technical Services.” The session included four presentations, two addressing workflow efficiency and production from the digital library perspective, one on workflow related to their library’s discovery system, and one on cataloging during the pandemic. It was attended by over 280 people and was well received by the participants. Please see program details below.
ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) Program
Friday, March 11, 12-1 pm (CST), 2022 ALA Core IG Week
Theme: Workflow Trends and Cases in Library Technical Services
Digital Library Workflow & Practices
Implementing a Multiphase Metadata Production Model and Workflow in DSpace
Emily Crawford, MIT Libraries
This presentation will give an overview of the development, testing and implementation process of a Multiphase Metadata Production (MPMP) model and workflow in MIT's DSpace instance for MIT Open Access Articles Collection. The collection in the repository includes scholarly publications, chiefly articles, written by MIT-affiliated authors under the MIT Faculty Open Access Policy or publisher agreements.
Realizing a new workflow was needed to expedite availability of papers, to reduce the backlog of Open Access (OA) article submissions plus create flexibility for targeted descriptive work, I created a model for multiphase metadata production. Collaborating with the Scholarly Communications and Collection Services Department, a workflow for multiphase metadata production was developed, which enabled us to significantly reduce the backlog of uncataloged materials, while maintaining the ability to enhance descriptive metadata after the articles have been released to the public.
Scaling Up Digital Collection Building with a Cross-Unit Database
Xiaoli Ma, University of Florida
Teamwork makes the dream work. Multiple teams from two colleges at the University of Florida established an online database to track the digital collection building progress and to smooth transitions between the two units. By facilitating communication, this database transforms multiple teams into one where everyone works together to scale up the work of building an online oral history collection. The exciting result: in half a year, over 500 oral history interviews were added to the digital collection, about a 10% increase to our holdings.
The collection-building process begins with the Samuel Proctor Oral History Program (SPOHP) at the College of Arts and Sciences, where the production team organizes digital media files and creates metadata drafts for interviews recorded digitally, and for older interviews recorded on the analog tapes, grant funded project teams initiate the similar process. The Digital Support Services (DSS) at the Smathers Libraries then reviews and ingests the metadata, ultimately uploading the media files to the digital collection. DSS also leads the efforts of updating and cleaning up legacy records.
This presentation will share how the teams reached the consensus that a database is necessary, details the phases of database development, and lists out the limitations of our methods. It will provide learnings for other cross-unit and cross-institutional digital projects.
Traditional Cataloging & Workflow
Loading e-Subscription MARC Records Directly into Our Discovery System
Kathleen (Kathy) Peters, Operations Supervisor – Technical Services, Douglas College Library, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
What do you do when some of your e-subscription data is not managed automatically by your ILS or discovery platform vendor? Many libraries load the MARC records manually into their ILS and then the data is moved through some process to their discovery system. This has a significant impact on authority work, subject browse, etc. inside the ILS because vendor MARC records have many issues. What if you could load the records directly into your discovery system instead? In 2021 Douglas College Library reviewed all its e-subscriptions and created a "custom catalogue" inside the EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS) system where we can load/update/delete vendor records directly through FTP to that space which is under our control. This presentation will give an overview of what we did and why, and what our workflow is for these records.
Cataloging during the Pandemic
Adapting to the Crisis: Changing Cataloging Processes during the Pandemic
Fang H. Gao, Donna J. Kraemer & Stephen Kharfen, U.S. Government Publishing Office
The U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) is a Federal government agency with a mission to keep America informed by producing, preserving, and distributing official Federal Government publications and information products for Congress, Federal agencies, and the American public. Library Services & Content Management (LSCM), a business unit within GPO, is responsible for administering four information dissemination programs that are mandated in Title 44 of the U.S. Code. Library Technical Services (LTS) within LSCM is responsible for the four elements of life cycle management of Federal government publications: acquisitions, classification, cataloging, and preservation. We will share how GPO transitioned to 100% telework and a maxiflex work schedule to maintain and improve services to Federal Depository Libraries, and how LTS adapted its tangible workflow to an online environment in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic made the possibility of using surrogates critical as GPO staff needed to check thousands of publications in order to authenticate its records. GPO submitted a proposal to the BIBCO Program at the Library of Congress to consider the use of surrogates to authenticate records. The Program for Cooperative Cataloging implemented a new policy on the use of reliable surrogates on Nov. 18, 2021.
Meets Core’s strategic goals for Advocacy and EDI
Second Activity
2022 ALA Annual Program: Workflow Adapts to DEI Cataloging or ILS Migration
The ALA Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) will host its roundtable discussions at the 2022 ALA Annual Conference.
Theme: Workflow Adapts to DEI Cataloging or ILS Migration
Time: June 26, Sunday, 4-5:00PM EDT, 2022
Location: Washington Convention Center, 150B
Programs:
Repairing the Catalog: Implementing DEI to Cataloging and Authority Work
Discussion Facilitator: Whitney Buccicone, Director of Discovery Services, University of Virginia Library
Changing our practices in Technical Services to make our description (in subject headings, authority records, and more) focus on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) and reparative work is crucial to our field these days. This discussion will focus on what work is being done at your institution, case studies from others, what blockers you may be facing in beginning this work and how DEI cataloging impacts your library’s workflow. We will discuss solutions to these blockers, how to implement DEI to cataloging as well as maximizing workflow efficiency for DEI cataloging.
Possible Discussion Questions:
What steps has your institution taken to applying DEI/reparative work in your description practices?
Have you heard of any other initiatives that other institutions have taken that you would like to share?
How does DEI cataloging affect your library’s workflow? How to improve workflow efficiency for DEI cataloging?
What blockers do you face in making progress in this area? How have you gotten administration buy-in for this work?
Migration Surprises: Workflows and Lessons Learned after Migration
Discussion Facilitators: Jennifer Eustis, Meghan Bergin, University of Massachusetts Amherst Libraries
Migration requires new workflows, workarounds, and new ways of approaching how librarians do their work at institutional as well as consortium levels. The facilitators of this roundtable will share their experiences of migrating to the open-source library services platform FOLIO at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and their consortium. It will include conversations about various aspects of transitioning during a migration and merge, such as training and documentation; metadata mapping and cleanup; the cutover process; and bumps encountered during go live and implementing full production using the new system.
Possible Discussion Questions:
How many of you have recently migrated or will migrate soon? Which library service platform did you or are you going to migrate to? How was that decision made?
What training did you conduct and how did you measure its effectiveness?
Did you decide to redo your documentation or update it for your new system?
When do you finish metadata cleanup? What lessons are we still learning from the migration process?
Meets Core’s strategic goals for Advocacy and EDI, Membership and Engagement
What will your group be working on for the next 6 months?
The Core Technical Services Workflow Efficiency Interest Group (TSWEIG) will organize programs for the future Core IG Week and ALA conferences, initiate discussions on developments and technological advances in the workflows associated with the evaluation, selection, acquisition, and discovery of library materials and resources, and other topics related to various aspects of technical services and related workflows.
Is there anything Core could have provided during this time that would have helped your group with its work?
The Core coordinators have been proactive and responsive in providing updates and helping with logistics. It might be even more helpful if important information (upcoming events, program planning ABC, where to register etc.) and updates can be posted in a central page or place so that the IG officers will have less or no confusions.
Submitted by Sai Deng, Yan Liao on 05/31/2022